In the video game world, the recent uproar over "Skull Island: Rise of Kong" has revealed troubling practices in the industry. Developed by Chilean indie game studio IguanaBee and published by GameMill Entertainment, the game has drawn widespread criticism for its lackluster production values and glitchy gameplay. A brunt of this backlash has stemmed from the revelation that the game was developed under considerable pressure in just one year.
This information was disclosed by anonymous current and former developers from IguanaBee. Reportedly, the game's development began in June the previous year, with the goal set to finish by June 2nd the following year. Driving this forceful production were anywhere from two to 20 workers working around the clock. According to one developer, the strenuous crunch period started in February, leaving all hopes for quality product lost by the end of the month.
This pattern has become all too familiar for the studio. In order to produce original games, IguanaBee has had to accept contract work, often complying with stringent publisher conditions and tight deadlines. As one developer professed, IguanaBee's relationship with the publishers is a love/hate situation: the studio depends on them for projects and funding, but in return, it must endure punishing schedules and unrealistic expectations.
For IguanaBee, the stakes are far from small. The studio has previously produced successful games, such as "What Lies in the Multiverse," a puzzle platformer that currently enjoys positive reviews on Steam. Yet, the contrast between their previous work and "Skull Island: Rise of Kong" could not be starker. According to SteamDB analytics, "Skull Island: Rise of Kong" saw a peak player count of just 22 on its launch day. Right now, a mere eight players are active in the game. This tepid reaction signifies a commercial failure, further dampening the studio's reputation.
The "Skull Island: Rise of Kong" debacle serves as a stark reminder that the world of video game development is not always a glamorous one. While it calls to question the methods employed by IguanaBee, it also brings to the forefront the harsh realities faced by many studios in the industry. The pressures, deadlines, and strain imposed on these professionals are often overlooked, even though they can make or break a game’s success. It also emphasizes the need for consumers to be more conscious and understanding of the journey behind every game they play.
As unhappy as they are with the end product, players must remember that no one actually sets out to design a disappointing game. The struggles of "Skull Island: Rise of Kong" highlight the urgent need for changes within the industry that can better support creators and allow for the deliverance of products that both developers and players can be proud of.
You must be logged in to post a comment!
