Microsoft is set to appeal the IRS request for $28.9 billion in back taxes related to the period between 2004 and 2013, expressing disagreement with the proposed adjustments.

IRS Demands $28.9 Billion in Back Taxes from Microsoft

The software and cloud services behemoth, Microsoft, has found itself in a tussle with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS is demanding an astronomical $28.9 billion in back taxes, a sum levied in relation to the period stretching from 2004 to 2013. Microsoft has quickly voiced its disagreements over these imposed adjustments and already declared its intention to appeal.

Microsoft asserts that the proposed figure doesn’t factor in taxes paid by the company under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This pivotal element, it argues, could substantially reduce the final assessed figure by up to $10 billion. The company communicated its stance via statements: “The IRS recently sent us a series of Notices of Proposed Adjustment (NOPAs), sharing with us for the first time detailed information and explanations of their views about the issues in question."

The company clarified its intent to contest the IRS's proposed adjustments through an appeal process. Reiterating its adherence to IRS rules both domestically and internationally, the tech giant argues it has always dutifully paid the taxes they owe. Adding to its statement, it mentioned, “Microsoft historically has been one of the top U.S. corporate income taxpayers. Since 2004, we have paid over $67 billion in taxes to the U.S."

The dispute primarily orbits around how the company allocated profits among different countries and jurisdictions during the said period. The practical terminology used for this allocation method is transfer pricing. IRS regulations allow companies to use a specific arrangement for transfer pricing, known as cost-sharing. Large multinationals often resort to cost-sharing as it mirrors the global nature of their operations.

Microsoft explained its use of cost-sharing as a reflection of how their subsidiaries shared the costs of developing certain intellectual property. As per IRS cost-sharing regulations, the subsidiaries were thus entitled to the related profits.

With a confident assertion that it has operated strictly within the boundaries of IRS rules and regulations, Microsoft paves the way for a hopeful mutual resolution with the IRS down the road. The ongoing tax dispute isn't likely to be resolved quickly, given the massive amount of money involved. Just to put it in context, $28.9 billion is nearly four times the amount Microsoft cashed out to acquire Bethesda a few years back!

While this battle might not directly impact Xbox, it's unclear whether the unfolding situation could generate ripples affecting other departments and projects within the company in the future.

With the ball now in Microsoft's court, the business conglomerate is expected to enter into long, meticulous negotiations with the IRS aimed at arriving at a consensus. While the proceedings promise to be protracted, the resolution will undoubtedly have vast implications for both the company and the industry at large.

Author Image

John Hope

Hey, I'm John Hope! Sneakers aren't just footwear to me, they're a lifestyle. Over the years, I've built a collection that would make any sneakerhead green with envy. But if you ask about my favorite? No competition, it's the Jordan 11. Those beauties are more than just shoes; they're a work of art, a piece of history. From the court to the street, my kicks tell my story. Join me on this sole-ful journey!

Post Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment!