Capcom's contemporary Resident Evil remakes have become some of the most prominent examples of how to revisit landmark games without simply preserving every old design decision. Resident Evil 2, Resident Evil 3, and Resident Evil 4 were rebuilt as modern third-person action-horror games, each using the RE Engine and each approaching its respective original with varying degrees of reinvention.
One question has remained especially persistent, though: why did the company begin with Resident Evil 2 rather than the game that introduced the series in 1996?
Longtime Resident Evil producer Jun Takeuchi has addressed that decision in a book published for the franchise's 30th anniversary. His comments point to two related reasons. First, Capcom had concerns about whether the original game's highly restrained, methodical brand of horror would connect with a current audience. Second, the Raccoon City disaster depicted at the beginning of Resident Evil 2 was viewed as a more effective place to introduce the broader saga.
A modern remake line that began with a sequel
For a series as foundational as Resident Evil, the order of the modern remake releases is unusual. The original Resident Evil established the Umbrella Corporation, the mansion incident, S.T.A.R.S., and the early biohazard mythology. It would seem, at least on paper, like the natural first candidate for a complete contemporary rebuild.
For useful background on this topic, read GTA 6 Will Be Playable on Xbox One Through Cloud Gaming at Launch.
Instead, Capcom's large-scale remake push began with Resident Evil 2 in 2019. That project replaced the fixed camera angles and tank controls of the 1998 game with an over-the-shoulder perspective, while retaining much of the police-station setting, the dual Leon and Claire setup, and the escalating catastrophe spreading through Raccoon City. It was followed by Resident Evil 3 in 2020 and Resident Evil 4 in 2023.
The first Resident Evil is not without a remake. Capcom released a remake in 2002, initially for Nintendo GameCube, and that version is widely admired in its own right. It expanded the Spencer Mansion, added new enemies and areas, and delivered a major visual upgrade for its era. Yet it was also designed around many of the structural characteristics of the 1996 original: pre-rendered backgrounds, changing camera angles, deliberate movement, and classic survival-horror resource management.
That makes it fundamentally different from the newer remakes. A player moving from Resident Evil 2 Remake to the 2002 Resident Evil remake can still encounter a game with intentionally old-fashioned rhythms. The tension comes not only from monsters but also from navigation, uncertainty, limited inventory space, and the vulnerability created by its control and camera systems.
Takeuchi on the original game's "stoic" horror
Takeuchi described Resident Evil 1 as a "stoic game," explaining that its horror relies heavily on that quality. He said Capcom was concerned that the experience might not resonate with contemporary players if it had been selected as the first project in the more recent remake initiative.
The exact shade of meaning behind "stoic" is difficult to lock down when comments have been translated second-hand. Still, the general point is easy to understand in context. The original Resident Evil is comparatively quiet, slow, and confined. Its dread is built over time as players explore a mansion that initially feels mysterious and later becomes increasingly hostile. It does not chase the same immediate spectacle as later games in the series.
Its most famous design ideas are also deeply tied to the conventions of 1990s console horror. Doors load between rooms. Camera angles can obscure a threat or reveal it at an uncomfortable moment. Ammunition must be conserved. The player may save only by spending limited ink ribbons, depending on the selected difficulty. Even simple movement and aiming demand a degree of adjustment from people raised on modern dual-stick controls.
Those ingredients are not flaws for fans who value classic survival horror. They are a substantial part of the game's identity. But Capcom's concern appears to have been that introducing the modern remake program through such a reserved and mechanically distinctive experience could create a barrier for newcomers.
Resident Evil 2 offered a different proposition. The game could preserve the fear, scarcity, and puzzle-solving associated with traditional Resident Evil while placing them inside a more instantly readable framework. A police station overrun during a citywide outbreak provides a clear premise. Leon S. Kennedy and Claire Redfield are easy characters to follow. The danger is visible from the opening minutes, and the scope expands naturally from a single building into the collapse of Raccoon City.
Raccoon City as the series' practical starting point
Takeuchi also argued that the Raccoon City incident is, in effect, the starting point of the Resident Evil saga. That statement may sound surprising given the mansion incident that came before it, but it reflects the role Resident Evil 2 plays in establishing the franchise for a much larger audience.
Resident Evil begins in the Spencer Mansion on the outskirts of Raccoon City, where Chris Redfield, Jill Valentine, and their S.T.A.R.S. teammates uncover Umbrella's experiments. Resident Evil 2 turns the consequences of that secretive incident into a full civic disaster. The infection is no longer isolated in a remote estate or hidden laboratory. It has consumed streets, public buildings, and ordinary lives across an entire city.
That escalation makes Resident Evil 2 a particularly accessible entry point. New players do not need detailed knowledge of the previous game to understand the central problem: a rookie police officer and a college student searching for her brother arrive in a city that has already fallen apart. Through Leon and Claire, players gradually discover Umbrella's role, meet important returning and new characters, and see the scale of the biohazard threat.
Takeuchi said that experiencing this event was considered the best way to introduce the origins. In other words, Resident Evil 2 may be a numerical sequel, but it functions as a practical beginning for the wider mythology and for the series' lasting image of urban zombie horror.
That rationale also helps explain why the 2019 remake was so effective as a major modern release. It was not merely an exercise in nostalgia for players who remembered 1998. It was constructed as a gateway: a polished, approachable survival-horror game that could teach new audiences what Resident Evil is while still giving longtime followers familiar places, threats, and story beats to revisit.
The original Resident Evil remains a major missing piece
Even with Takeuchi's explanation, the demand for a new interpretation of Resident Evil 1 is unlikely to disappear. The mansion incident remains central to the franchise's history, and the modern remake line has now covered several of the series' most celebrated installments. Seeing the Spencer Mansion, its puzzles, and its gradually unfolding secrets rebuilt around the RE Engine is an appealing prospect.
There have been rumors suggesting that a new Resident Evil 1 project may be in early development. However, Capcom has not officially announced such a game, and there is no firmly substantiated reporting that confirms those rumors. Until that changes, fans should treat talk of a new remake as speculation rather than a confirmed product.
A potential new version would also face an interesting creative challenge. The newer remakes have demonstrated that Capcom is willing to make meaningful changes rather than reproduce every scene, mechanic, or route exactly. But Resident Evil 1's atmosphere is inseparable from its restraint. A remake would need to modernize the controls and presentation expected by current players without losing the isolation that made the mansion so unnerving.
That balancing act may be precisely why the project was not the company's first step. Resident Evil 2 provided an easier bridge between classic survival-horror principles and contemporary design expectations. Its success showed that audiences would embrace a tense, resource-conscious Resident Evil with modern controls, detailed environments, and cinematic presentation.
For now, Capcom's remake history suggests that starting with Resident Evil 2 was a deliberate decision rather than an oversight. The original game was judged to be a more difficult introduction because of its stillness and older design foundations, while the Raccoon City incident offered a larger, clearer, and more immediately welcoming way into the series. Whether Resident Evil 1 eventually receives the same full-scale treatment remains unanswered, but its place at the center of the franchise ensures the question will keep returning.
Community
Discussion
Start the conversation.
No comments have been posted yet.