In an industry dominated by the giants of gaming, the story of Atari’s battle against Nintendo unfolds like a David and Goliath tale—with Atari charging headlong into what many saw as an unwinnable war. This narrative covers Lawrence Siegel's attempt to rejuvenate Atari's software development while Nintendo held an unyielding monopoly. Siegel, with a substantial background in the gaming industry since 1972, became part of Atari after his own company, Memetron, was bought out by the corporation in 1987. He was positioned to steer Atari back into competition in the gaming market, a task that proved more Sisyphean than expected.
Siegel's tenure at Atari was tumultuous, defined by the difficult challenge of attracting third-party developers to make games for Atari's technology. The company's owner, Jack Tramiel, who was also the mind behind the Commodore 64, was convinced that cheaper, better hardware was the key to market dominance. This belief contradicted the industry's understanding that it was the games, rather than the consoles, that drove sales. Tramiel's focus on cutting costs and his inability to recognize the importance of attractive software offerings led to persistent clashes with Siegel and other executives who foresaw disaster in this strategy.
Taking a step back to the late '80s, Siegel describes the atmosphere at Atari as one where decision-making was constantly influenced by the Tramiel family’s penny-pinching mindset. This was exemplified by Siegel's recount of a meeting with Sega, where he, alongside Atari’s then-president Mike Katz, successfully brokered a deal to market the Sega Genesis in the U.S. Yet, the proposition was swiftly shut down by Tramiel due to cost considerations, a decision that would haunt Atari as the Genesis flourished.
Another significant product discussed was the Atari Lynx—a handheld device with advanced features for its time, such as a color screen. Despite its potential, the Lynx faltered as Sega and Nintendo's agreements with developers barred them from creating games for competing devices, leaving the Lynx with a barren software library. In a bold move which reflected Atari's desperation, the company even filed a $250 million antitrust lawsuit against Nintendo, which ended in Nintendo's victory and further legal humiliation for Atari.
Post-Lynx discussions centered on the doomed Atari Panther console, another failed venture that Siegel viewed as a continuation of Atari's futile hardware-centric approach. Despite potential in its technology, the Panther lacked the critical support of compelling games needed to anchor the console in the market and ultimately ended up a lost display of Atari's missed opportunities.
Throughout his account, Siegel emphasizes the broad gap between Tramiel's hardware obsession and the software-driven reality of the gaming industry. Upon reflecting on the various hardware projects, such as the Lynx, Panther, and later the Jaguar, Siegel explains that it was Atari's hardware fixation and failure to secure exclusive, engaging titles that led to its undoing.
Siegel’s story concludes with his exit from Atari in 1992, subsequent start of Black Pearl Software, and later partnership with THQ—a contrasting experience to his frustrating period at Atari. He reflects on Atari's reluctance to invest in powerful gaming IPs, such as a missed opportunity with Jurassic Park, which could have been a turning point for the company.
In the grand narrative of gaming history, Atari's tale is a cautionary one about the perils of failing to adapt and appreciate the true drivers of consumer interest. It's a reminder that in the world of video games, software is truly king, and those who choose to ignore the throne often find themselves dethroned.
You must be logged in to post a comment!
