Former Valve Writer Chet Faliszek Says Steam's Guiding Idea Is an MMO

Steam is easy to describe in practical terms: it is a PC storefront, library manager, download client and launcher for a vast number of games. But former Valve writer Chet Faliszek believes that description misses the larger idea behind the service. In a recent YouTube discussion focused on Epic's platform updates, Faliszek said Gabe Newell's vision for Steam has long been much broader: Steam should be understood as an MMO-like ecosystem.

That framing is not meant to suggest Steam is secretly a traditional massively multiplayer game with quests, raids and combat. Instead, Faliszek's point is that Steam has spent years building the kinds of lightweight social systems that make players feel present within a persistent shared space. Account levels, badges, trading cards, profile showcases, inventories, awards, groups and community activity all give users ways to participate that extend beyond pressing a button to buy or launch a game.

For Faliszek, that underlying philosophy is a crucial distinction when comparing Steam with competing PC game stores. A store can offer games, sales and technical improvements, but those basics do not necessarily give people a reason to return, develop an identity or feel attached to the platform itself. Steam's broad set of user-facing systems, he argues, does.

Steam as a place rather than a checkout page

Faliszek characterized Steam's "North Star" as an MMO. The term highlights a difference between a service built primarily around transactions and one built around ongoing participation. Players do not only arrive on Steam to acquire a product. They may browse friends' activity, alter a profile, earn a badge, inspect an inventory, write or read reviews, hand out an award, participate in a discussion or list a small digital item on the Community Market.

For useful background on this topic, read Diablo 4's Missing Bovine Gloves Finally Appear After a Secret Cow Encounter.

None of those actions needs to be especially deep on its own. In fact, their small scale may be part of why they work. A player does not need to learn a creation suite or commit hours to a project to add a profile background, display a favorite achievement, collect a badge or sell a duplicate card. These systems create frequent, low-effort moments of engagement around a player's game library and social identity.

Steam account levels are a straightforward example. They are not a measure of competitive skill, and they do not determine whether someone can enjoy a purchased game. Yet leveling provides visible progression across a person's time on the service. Badges and profile customization turn that progression into something that can be displayed. The result resembles familiar MMO design: play and participation produce rewards, rewards contribute to status or appearance, and status becomes visible to other people in the same environment.

Trading cards fit the model particularly well. Cards are tied to games, can be collected and combined into badges, and may be exchanged or sold. The value of an individual card can be tiny, but the act of receiving, trading or selling one gives players another small interaction with the platform. Faliszek specifically contrasted this quick, accessible reward loop with systems that demand substantially more work before a user can meaningfully express themselves.

Player expression does not have to mean making a game

A central part of Faliszek's argument is that Steam lets people express themselves without requiring them to become creators in the conventional sense. A Steam user can curate a profile, choose visual decorations, show achievements, organize a game library, join social spaces and signal interests through the games they own and play. It is a passive form of expression, but still a meaningful one.

That distinction matters in the comparison with Epic's ecosystem. Epic offers powerful creative avenues through Unreal Editor for Fortnite, commonly known as UEFN, as well as the broader Unreal Engine toolset. Those tools can enable ambitious work, including experiences made by users and developers with serious creative goals. But Faliszek's criticism is not that such tools lack value. It is that they address a different kind of audience participation.

Building something in UEFN or learning game-development tools requires time, confidence and a willingness to engage with a far more demanding process. Most players will never do that, even if they appreciate the worlds and modes made by others. By contrast, Steam's cards, profiles, awards and similar features are available to people who simply want a quick way to personalize their presence or take part in a wider community.

In MMO terms, not everyone wants to be a world builder. Many players are happy to equip an item, raise a visible number, trade an object, visit a guild-like social area or show off something they have earned. Steam's long-running ecosystem is designed around those modest but repeatable behaviors. Its community identity is built not only by major creators, reviewers and modders, but also by ordinary users making tiny decisions about how they appear and interact.

Why features can matter as much as speed

Faliszek was unconvinced by the idea that faster loading or launcher performance, on its own, can become a compelling competitive message. Technical improvements are welcome, particularly for a client that people use daily, but they do not automatically explain why a player should care about a platform. His broader criticism is that a service needs a clear direction that connects its features and gives them a purpose.

Steam's purpose, in this reading, is not merely efficiency. It is an ongoing game-adjacent environment where users have history, possessions, customization and social context. That helps explain why a client with plenty of menus, community functions and legacy features can maintain such strong player loyalty. A person's Steam account may contain years of purchases, playtime, achievements, friend connections, reviews, screenshots, workshop subscriptions and profile items. Leaving it behind can feel less like switching retailers and more like stepping away from a long-used online home.

That does not mean every Steam feature is equally beloved, or that the client is free from friction. Steam's complexity can be intimidating, and some users may prefer a cleaner interface with fewer layers. But Faliszek's view is that this density is not accidental clutter alone. Much of it reflects a platform attempting to give players a sense of agency and consequence inside its own ecosystem.

He also pushed back on recent rhetoric from Epic chief executive Tim Sweeney directed at Gabe Newell, arguing that jabs and broad promises are not a substitute for presenting users with a persuasive reason to adopt a platform. A competitor needs more than an assertion that it will be better. It needs to identify what kind of place it wants to be for the people using it.

The moderation problem remains part of the discussion

Faliszek did not portray Steam's community layer as an uncomplicated success. He acknowledged that Valve has valid work to do in monitoring and controlling behavior within the service. Any platform that hosts discussions, user-generated content, communication and commercial exchanges at Steam's scale faces moderation challenges, and a system that gives people more visibility and agency can also create more opportunities for abuse.

That caveat is important because the MMO comparison cuts both ways. Persistent online worlds can foster belonging, identity and memorable social encounters, but they can also become difficult to govern. Steam's community tools give users a place to act, react and be seen. They also require meaningful safeguards if that participation is to remain useful and welcoming.

The issue is not separate from Steam's appeal; it is part of the cost of building a service that functions as more than a catalog. A stripped-down store may have fewer community headaches, but it may also offer fewer reasons for users to invest emotionally in the service. The difficult task is maintaining the benefits of player expression while reducing the harms that can emerge in large online communities.

A useful lens for the PC storefront battle

Calling Steam an MMO is a provocative shorthand, but it provides a useful way to understand why the PC storefront competition is not solely about revenue shares, exclusives, free games or download speeds. Steam's advantage is also cultural and behavioral. It has years of accumulated systems that turn a game library into a personal record and a social profile into a flexible identity.

Rival platforms do not necessarily need to duplicate every card, badge or marketplace feature to compete. In fact, copying Steam feature for feature may not be the best answer. But Faliszek's comments suggest they need their own coherent philosophy for how players belong there. Creative tools can be part of that vision, as can performance, pricing or developer support. The challenge is making those pieces feel relevant to ordinary players rather than only to a dedicated minority.

Steam's staying power, through this lens, comes from treating its users as more than customers. They are collectors, friends, critics, traders, achievement hunters, profile designers and community members. They may still primarily visit to play games, but the surrounding systems make their participation visible. That is why Faliszek sees an MMO at the heart of the service: not a game in the literal sense, but a shared digital world built from countless small player interactions.