Arc Raiders is moving to a substantially stricter anti-cheat policy. Embark has confirmed that accounts caught using known cheat programs will now receive permanent bans as standard, ending a previous approach that allowed some first-time offenders another opportunity. The studio's message is unambiguous: players found cheating should not expect a warning, a temporary suspension, or a second chance.
The tougher enforcement arrives as Embark continues to confront cheating and coordinated matchmaking abuse in its extraction shooter. Executive producer Aleksander Grøndal said the team considers unfair play a major issue and has put significant time and financial resources into combating it. While the developer has not always publicly detailed its security work, Grøndal stressed that a lack of frequent updates should not be read as a lack of action.
For a game built around raids where players can lose equipment, progress and hard-earned rewards, the stakes are particularly high. A cheater can do more than secure an easy win: they can undermine the tension that makes extraction games work, disrupt other players' sessions, and make a fair defeat feel impossible to accept. Embark's latest measures are intended to make both detection and repeat cheating more difficult.
Permanent bans are now the baseline
The central policy shift is simple. Embark says that an account detected using cheats will be permanently banned. The policy applies to all known cheat programs, with permanent removal now positioned as the default consequence rather than a final escalation after a warning.
For useful background on this topic, read Modern Warfare 4 mastery camos: Every Multiplayer, Warzone and DMZ Reward Revealed.
That marks a response to criticism over the earlier handling of first-time offenders. Some players had objected to the idea that someone caught cheating could potentially return after being given another chance. Embark now says its enforcement model will not include those warnings or second chances for accounts caught using cheats.
Permanent account bans alone are often not enough to deter organized or persistent offenders, particularly in games where creating a replacement account may be relatively easy. Embark is therefore emphasizing several layers of sanctions designed to make returning under a new identity more complicated.
License restrictions and linked-account action
One of those layers involves license restrictions. Embark has broadened its use of measures that can prevent a particular copy of Arc Raiders from being used on another account after that copy has been connected to a ban. In practical terms, this is intended to stop a player from treating an account ban as a minor inconvenience and immediately using the same game access with a newly created profile.
The studio is also tightening its response to linked accounts. Embark says that if an account has ever been associated with a copy of the game that was banned, that connected account can receive a permanent ban as well. The stated aim is to close off a path that repeat offenders may use to bypass ordinary account-level punishment.
These policies can be especially consequential in a multiplayer ecosystem because they focus on relationships between accounts and game licenses, rather than judging each profile as though it exists in complete isolation. For legitimate players, the important takeaway is that account sharing and unclear ownership arrangements may carry greater risk when a game is actively policing connections to sanctioned copies.
Detection tools are being strengthened over time
Embark says its cheat detection systems are becoming stronger month by month. Its current protection includes kernel-level technology from Denuvo, detections supplied by Anybrain, and a growing range of internal models using machine learning and other data. Those systems are designed to identify suspicious or unusual behavior that may indicate cheating.
The developer did not present those tools as fully automatic judges that act without oversight. Instead, the systems are part of a broader detection process meant to flag behavior that deserves scrutiny and improve Embark's ability to identify unfair play. That distinction matters in anti-cheat work, where developers must balance quick responses against the need to avoid punishing legitimate players incorrectly.
Embark also noted that it is conducting limited testing of Elytra anti-cheat in The Finals. The technology could potentially be used in Arc Raiders in the future, although no commitment or implementation date was announced. For now, it is one of several avenues the studio is exploring while it continues to update its existing defenses.
Security teams typically avoid spelling out every technical detail behind their detection methods, since too much disclosure can help cheat makers adapt. Grøndal acknowledged that Embark has sometimes chosen not to share changes publicly for precisely that reason. The studio's latest explanation is therefore less a complete technical breakdown than an outline of the tools, policies and goals guiding its anti-cheat effort.
Hardware bans could become more widespread
Embark can already apply hardware bans in cases where it has sufficient evidence that a single machine is being used for cheating. Such a penalty is more severe than removing access from one account because it can prevent Arc Raiders from running on the identified system itself.
The developer is working to expand the number of systems it can target with hardware bans. Grøndal said the team hopes to implement that broader capability later in the year, allowing sanctions to reach almost every system detected running cheat software. The wording leaves some uncertainty around the exact scope and timing, but the direction is clear: Embark wants more tools to stop repeat offenders from cycling through accounts on the same hardware.
Hardware-level penalties are not a magic solution by themselves. Persistent cheat users may attempt to change devices, alter their setup, or seek new ways around enforcement. But when combined with account, license and linked-account restrictions, they increase the cost and effort required to return. That layered approach is at the heart of Embark's current strategy.
Queue teaming has also been reduced
Cheat software is not the only form of unfair behavior being targeted. Embark has also taken action against queue teaming, a practice in which players coordinate their matchmaking so they land in the same solo lobby. Once there, they can cooperate against Raiders who entered the match alone, creating an advantage that defeats the purpose of a solo queue.
After separating known queue-teamers through matchmaking, Embark reported a sharp early improvement. Within five days, the studio saw 85% fewer players engaging in the behavior. It also said the rate of raids spoiled by queue teaming fell from roughly one in 50 to one in 300, without any meaningful effect on queue times.
Those figures suggest that matchmaking interventions can be valuable alongside traditional anti-cheat systems. Not every harmful action depends on software manipulation; some players exploit social coordination, matchmaking patterns or loopholes in intended game rules. Treating those behaviors as part of the same wider fair-play problem is important for an extraction shooter, where the perception that every encounter is legitimate can be nearly as important as the outcome of the fight.
Embark does not expect cheating to disappear entirely
Despite the tougher language and expanded sanctions, Embark is not claiming it can eradicate cheating forever. Grøndal described video game cheating as a multibillion-dollar industry and acknowledged that it will never fully vanish. Cheat developers continuously adapt, while players looking for an unfair edge continue to create demand for their tools.
The more realistic objective, Embark says, is to make cheating difficult, expensive and short-lived. Stronger detection should find offenders sooner. Permanent bans should raise the consequences. Restrictions tied to licenses, associated accounts and hardware should make it harder to return. And matchmaking changes should reduce non-software exploits such as coordinated solo-lobby teaming.
That is an ongoing battle rather than a single patch-sized fix, and Embark's statement frames it that way. The developer says it is continuing to improve detection, accelerate enforcement, limit repeat offenders' ability to re-enter the game, and protect Raiders who are playing fairly.
Frozen Trail update is next on the calendar
The anti-cheat update comes shortly before Arc Raiders' Frozen Trail update, scheduled for October 8. Grøndal has previously characterized Frozen Trail as feeling like a 2.0-style update for the game. Among its planned changes, Arc Raiders will allow players to unlock weapons and items without needing to hunt down blueprints.
As new content and progression changes arrive, fair matchmaking will remain central to whether players can enjoy them. A major update can bring returning players and renewed attention, but it can also expose longstanding frustrations if exploiters are allowed to dominate raids. Embark's renewed commitment to permanent bans and stronger repeat-offender restrictions is an attempt to ensure that the experience around Frozen Trail is shaped by legitimate competition rather than by cheats or coordinated abuse.
For Arc Raiders players, the immediate message is direct: cheating now carries a much higher likelihood of lasting consequences. Embark cannot promise a cheat-free future, but it is committing to faster action and a broader set of barriers for anyone caught trying to gain an unfair advantage.
Community
Discussion
Start the conversation.
No comments have been posted yet.